PUBLIC INTEREST WARNING: MR JASON BENNISON IS NOW OFFICIALLY BANKRUPT.
Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs
Navigation
  • Bennison is bankrupt
  • 2017 – Best Ever Year!
    • Failures
    • Nominet
  • Jason Bennison (Zeke)
    • Business interests
    • Dealing with Bailiffs
    • Failures
    • Pretences and fantasies
    • Money Making Schemes
  • Personal abuse
  • Bad advice
    • Costs orders
    • Misunderstood legislation
    • Magistrate court fines
    • Council Tax enforcement
    • Odd Posts strange ideas
  • David Lindley
  • Mark Bowley
    • Mark’s wild rants
  • Pote Snitkin
  • Other subjects

CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal

VAT and the High cour

 

Its not exactly a new subject, but there is still a lot of misunderstanding about this. Leading to many  initiating costly and unnecessary Detailed Assessment Hearings.

The current advice given in the government briefing notice refers to fees paid to the HCEO  for their services, not by debtors who pay fees to licensed self employed EAs operating under a HCEO power.

In other words, the creditor, who pays the HCEO for their services will pay vat, because the HCEO can offset it against their output  VAT. This is the usual procedure.

If the creditor is VAT registered he will also be able to reclaim it by offsetting it against his output tax in the usual way.

This is where the confusion arises. It is not about the payment of VAT by debtors to enforcement agents, which is calculated on proceeds. That is well understood, and decided.

Debtors are liable.

.Seek proper advice if you are unsure.

 

14th December 2019 / Featured

Share the Post

Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal"

Manage Subscriptions ∨





Guest
PB
1 year 5 months ago

I came across A post by pote

It seems to be addressed to me?

All comments made by me on this subject were made before August 1sr the regulations under the TCE have yet to be changed. But of course until they are we will have to advise as instructed.

He says only I held this opinion, not so. Bailiffs were charging vat for 7years, I dont instruct bailiffs

Because of remarks like this, that make no sense, I dont think I need to respond further. All legal explanation is on this thread.

I suggest you place.both hands above your desk and try to concentrate.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Author
Schedule One
1 year 8 months ago

Oh my God, Pote is on another of his dead-end theories, he has lots on that forum, and on Cag. He has two major characteristics, he always attaches himself to the biggest get out of debt looney he can see, and he always quotes things out of context. Famous for it.

Won’t let go even after his mates tell him he is wrong. Perhaps he needs to send some FOI requests?

He says that only two people believe debtors have to pay VAT on fees. I honestly didn’t know my word was so powerful, I wonder who the other one is? Because VAT is charged, as we know.

The phrase he quotes from guidance via Mr Wilson is correct of course, although out of context, enforcement fees on schedule 12 are paid to the EA, not the HCEO.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Author
Schedule One
1 year 8 months ago

Fees paid to EA’s are kept by the EAs and therefore liable to pay VAT generated from them.

The total fees and allowable expenses payable in respect of services provided by the different people involved are set out in the relevant Sheriff’s Fees Order. The value for VAT purposes is the amount each person gets as their share of the statutory fee and any expenses charged are recoverable from the debtor.

Anyway, where is this case, Bennison? lying again were we?
I don’t know who I feel sorry for more, the man who cannot stop lying or the fools who believe him.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             Hide Replies ∧
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Starterfor10
1 year 8 months ago

Perhaps if they read carefully (,i.e. by starting at the begining right through to the end) they might understand/see things a lot clearer.
I would also be interested in reading the facts to these cases Bennison is so fond of giving. ” I don’t know who I feel sorry for more, the man who cannot stop lying or the fools who believe him” I am with you on that..

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Author
Schedule One
1 year 8 months ago

The problem with Bennison and his ilk are that they don’t understand how to read the subject matter.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Brown Owl
1 year 8 months ago

It looks as if they glance through the written word rather than read it properly, then pick out the bits they think are relevent to their argument in an attempt to score brownie points. I guess joined up thinking is not prevalent in-house over on Bailiff Help Forum/Bailiff Talk.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Author
Schedule One
1 year 8 months ago

Indeed, and sometimes they are referring to the wrong legislation anyway. Thats what you get if you just search a few words on google.
It’s Freeman of the land thinking.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Momma's House
1 year 8 months ago

Lets wait and see what VAT the HCEO charges when they attend his mothers house to collect your £7,5 grand Peter.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Author
Schedule One
1 year 8 months ago

I also came about this, in relation to Bowley and Marks Part 62 problems.

The Statute
common law right
It is self-evident that s. 62 of the TCEA provides that the power conferred by a Writ of control is exercisable only by using the procedure in Schedule 12 to the Act, which includes any Regulations enacted under Sch. 12. It is clear (per Leggatt LJ quoted above) that Sch. 12 and not aspects of the common law govern the validity of taking control of goods.

Sorry, but you were wrong again it seems.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
See?????
1 year 8 months ago

The Government version of the pos below:
The Sheriff’s Officer organises the activities of the bailiffs and, where necessary, the sale of the debtor’s goods. In some areas, they are a salaried employee of the Under-Sheriff. In others, they are a self-employed sole proprietor or partner working either full-time as a Sheriff’s Officer or part-time as a Sheriff’s Officer with other business activities such as an auctioneer.

If they are not an employee their services are taxable. The position of bailiffs is similar to this.

The other people involved in High Court debt recovery work, for example, locksmiths, auctioneers or removal men are also regarded as making taxable supplies in the course of their businesses.

(b) Nature and value of supply

The total fees and allowable expenses payable in respect of services provided by the different people involved are set out in the relevant Sheriff’s Fees Order. The value for VAT purposes is the amount each person gets as their share of the statutory fee and any expenses charged. The full amount charged, including tax, is recoverable from the debtor.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



 
  • Next Post
  • Previous Post

PUBLIC INTEREST WARNING

Mr Bennison was made bankrupt as a result of the £26,000 costs order that Nominet obtained against him in September 2017. His bankruptcy hearing took place on October 2nd 2018 at Kingston County Court and Jason Bennison has lost yet another case, where costs will be awarded to the Defendant. This may result in Bennison's second bankruptcy is he is unable to pay.

If you have any comments or issues regarding this site, please Contact us

Recent Comments

  • Schedule One on Nominet and Bennison’s Bankruptcy: it was all for nothing!
  • Schedule One on Nominet and Bennison’s Bankruptcy: it was all for nothing!
  • Schedule One on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Pb on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Schedule One on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Peter.Bardsley (Ba 78 lanks) on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Beagle on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Quatlose on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • I Dunno on Bennison v Bardsley
  • peter Frank Bardsley on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Peter on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Santa on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Sigmond on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Walt on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Walt on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Halloween on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Bennison the debtor on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Dick on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • striker on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Bennison serial Debtor on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Nonono on Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Friend on Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Schedule One on CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Schedule One on Bennison v Bardsley

Recent Posts

  • Council Tax Bailiffs, Fines from Magistrate Court Bailiffs, High Court Bailiffs.
  • Odd and Interesting Stories That Caught my Eye
  • Bennison’s Bailiff Help Forum Archives
  • Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Bennison v Bardsley
  • Jason Bennison.com : Mr Bennisons new assault on the legal services market.
  • Mark Bowley Rants. Random insults and assorted verbage of an internet troll.
  • CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Jason Bennison picks on small cake shop, Why?

The Best of 2017

  • Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • The Best of 2017
  • Bennison’s Nemesis: Nominet
  • 2017 – Best Ever Year for Bennison & BHF!
  • Rantaholic Bowley ends the year in a high note
  • New Year, new abode for Bennison

Categories

Sign Up Newsletter

Make sure you don’t miss interesting happenings
by joining our newsletter program.