Following on from a day when Mark must have worn out both his fingertips and keyboard, he couldn’t stop even when the witching hour arrived.
by Statto » 04 Mar 2017 00:07
There is so much more than that.
Just like with that woman the other week who could not get Mrs X off the phone, David suffered the same, sometimes receiving as many as 15 calls a day from this self obsessed raving lunatic.
Sometimes, the only way to shake her off your back is to literally fall out with her. David wasn’t the first to be placed in that position and he won’t be the last.
Mrs X needs to be certified. She is aggressive and obsessive to the extreme. It is not fair to the others who post on the forums to be bullied and pushed around by an idiot who quite frankly knows less than the people that she is bullying.
Notice she is being very quiet today/tonight? She knows when its best to shut up all right.
Nowadays most phones offer a number blocking facility so if you do not wish to speak to somebody, you don’t even need to be disturbed. Failing that, there’s answering machines and network answering systems. As a last resort, you just say “don’t bother me again” and hang up! There simply is no way to force someone to talk on the phone with you. It’s just one more argument against Mrs X, and an extremely flimsy one.
by Statto » 04 Mar 2017 00:27
Anyone want to guess who forced ?? to count up the posts on here on a daily basis, monitoring how many posts were made in the members forums?
10 out of 10 if you got the right answer – The bully that is Mrs X
What Mrs X did to ?? and indeed others is deplorable. Despite ?? fragile state and attempted suicides (as confirmed by Mrs X and her lackeys), he was still forced to make these post counts on a daily basis, still forced to post on forums what Mrs X bullied him into saying and still forced to create websites, displaying the text that Mrs X bullied him into posting.
Today Mrs X is making much of the stick that ?? received and make no mistake, ?? did receive stick. My question to you Mrs X is why are you so vocal now yet at the time, you turned your back on ?? and left him to fend for himself?
It seems to me that today, Mrs X wants to make a lot more about what went on years ago, than she did at the time.
Note how many times he mentions Mrs X, an obvious attempt at getting Google to pick up the name and associate it with the defamatory content posted.
The idea of Mrs X, or anyone else for that matter, forcing a “poor, innocent victim” not only to count posts, but also to create entire websites, is preposterous, especially when you consider that there was no personal or working relationship between Mrs X and her “victim”, they were just internet acquaintances.
It’s clear that, by that time, Mark was all out of valid arguments to rant against Mrs X, having spent all day posting them, and was left with so little to say about his victim, that he had to resort to non-arguments.