Now Mark has found a new ranting platform, he is off and can’t stop. Hard to believe, but the below is just ONE post:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 09:56

Mr B’s card details HAVE been used to purchase a domain name. However, he is that thick that he didn’t know how to do it himself, so he passed all the card details, including pin number to someone who was intelligent enough to carry out the transaction.

 

If anybody wants this weeks shopping, cinema tickets or anything else bought, courtesy of Mr B, give me a shout – I’ll ping you over his card details.

 

As for Mrs X, she should be certified IMO. She probably goes days upon days out there in an isolated area, without seeing another person, apart from her husband who she claims suffered a serious stroke and has clearly not fully recovered. Unfortunately for the rest of us, Mrs X’s life now appears to be devoted to the internet and look at the trail of trouble she has caused over the past few years. It hasn’t been helped because she has managed to manipulate “Spiels on wheels” aka WD aka Beaujest and numerous other silly usernames. Spiels on wheels is a nasty piece of work and a liar, She has fanned the flames for Mrs X’s internet obsessions. To me, Mrs X is just another “look at me” cockney, always talking about herself and always making out how important she is, not too dissimilar from Chris Morris. Stupid people like Spiels on wheels fall for Mrs X’s spin.

 

People should look back on other forums and see just how much effort Mrs X used to put in, posting about this forum, sometimes taking over an hour at a time to post several posts on a thread dedicated to either Jason or BHF. She has file after file of every single post that Jason has ever made, going back 10 years. It is madness and it turned very nasty, much to the delight of the uneducated savage “Spiels on wheels”. Even now, Mrs X appears to be conducting some kind of sick count of how many posts are made in the members section of this forum. The question has to be asked, why? What can that possibly achieve?

 

Mrs X is the root cause of all the trouble. If she were to do the decent thing and go forth and multiply, I guarantee the trouble would stop overnight. I know she PMs all you Quatloosers claiming that “we” need her out of business in order to make a decent living. This is just another lie. In the same PM, she usually claims that Jason is not a competitor. The idiotic Mrs X hasn’t the intelligence to work out her own contradiction. The truth is, she hates Jason because he has taken work off her. Jason doesn’t care about Mrs X because her options to help debtors are very limited, restricted mainly to ripping debtors off by selling them hopelessly inadequate OOTs that could be obtained for free, elsewhere on the internet.

 

Mrs X is assisted in her campaign against Jason by bailiff companies. Jason doesn’t always get it right, as demonstrated by his nonsense in this thread but this forum costs the bailiff industry a lot of money each year. By the same token, Mrs X costs these companies nothing as her work is usually to challenge the council over a PCN or to lead a debtor to the welfare department of a bailiff company, ensuring that the debtor pays the “235 visit fee, when in most cases, it could have been avoided. Mrs X clearly has no care or compassion for debtors and this was highlighted in a recent telephone call to a lady who Mrs X had ripped off, whereby she bullied and intimidated this lady, despite constant pleas to let go, because the matter had been resolved. Mrs X thinks people are jealous of her. This is laughable. She is disliked because she is horrible, nasty, dishonest, devious, selfish and obsessive.

Is he for real?

He deliberately mentions Mrs X by name as many times as he can. One you start talking about someone, it becomes quite clear who you are referring to and a pronoun such as “he” or “she” would suffice. The only reason to include the name so many times within a paragraph would be to ensure it gets picked up and indexed by search engines, and that’s a truly despicable action, in addition to being in breach of the Defamation Act 2013.