Like an addict, once he starts ranting, he just can’t stop. It’s compulsive ranting what we’re looking at. On his previous rants, he has all but exhausted his arguments against Victim No. 1, so he now moves on to Victim No. 2:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 10:39

It looks like Mr B cannot carry out a simple credit card transaction, let alone anything else.

 

He’s just come out with this gem:

 

We do not Instigate.

Is he on drugs?

 

He and his fellow degenerates stalk this forum 24/7, posting every time Jason or one of us comments, regardless of whether it concerns them or not. Mr B often goes so far as to comment on threads on Quatloos that have nothing to do with him or even bailiffs.

 

Mr B, you utter,utter cretin. That is INSTIGATING.

 

One person hasn’t posted for more than 6 months (before their blog was revived) yet he has been subject to the most appalling attacks, despite Mrs X, Mr B and the Os all being asked to desist by the police. Clearly these people have no respect for the law.

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 12:47

Imbecile:

 

In fact, no one has been approached by the police yet alone being ordered to stop posting.

Notwithstanding the fact that “asked” has an entirely different meaning to “ordered”

 

We know full well that the police contacted the degenerates (and one other person) 2 by email, 2 by telephone. Mrs X made big of the fact that she had “not been contacted by telephone” so she would have been one of those contacted by email.

 

Regarding claims from Spiels on wheels to “prove it”, of course there are police witness statements to this effect (or affect if you are posting on the degenerates forum)

He’s now back to Victim No. 1, the main target of his abuse.

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 14:16

I have no more to add at this present time suffice to say, that I took note of his suggestion.

I wonder if this revolting, disgusting excuse of a human being would be so quick to make these ridiculous, vexatious complaints if she had to contribute to the cost of investigating them.

 

It really is deplorable that tax payers money should be eaten up on giving this serial, vexatious complainant the opportunity to time and time again waste the time of our over worked and over burdened police force. How can she possibly believe that a complaint is justified against a person whi is disabled and is clearly suffering distress from the comments that Mrs X posts about him? Even his wife stepped in to ask to be left alone over the Christmas period. These pleas fell on deaf ears as Mrs X and her revolting mix of followers carried on the persecution regardless.

 

Then Mrs X has the added dimension to turn into victim mode. Oh poor Mrs X, Oh victimised Mrs X. Lets all get the tissues out for Mrs X.

How many times must he mention Mrs X’s name?

Having spent the day ranting against his two main targets, he now moves onto Victim No. 3:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 14:50

As usual Mark chooses to misrepresent the facts to suit his own agenda.

So prey tell, O educated one, where is the justification for your mistress to carry out her wicked vengeance on a sick man just because he chose not to be bound by her silly “private and confidential” heading at the top of her emails? Is that what she wasted police time over?

 

You claim that your pathetic blog is to retaliate and that you do not instigate. How does that fit when you are attacking a man who does not even post?

 

The only retaliation is by your wicked mistress who never takes any prisoners and her uneducated, uncivilised lackey, Mrs O who would start a fight in a telephone box.

 

Mrs O has not even been affected directly, despite her pathetic attempts to make out that she haThis is further evidence of what a vile, nasty old lady Mrs O is.

He now goes back to Victim No. 2:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 18:21

Chimp

 

Please allow me to explain a few things in language that even a cretin like you will understand:

1. Calling me a FMOTL, thug, debt avoider etc is not going to drive me to suicide. Neither is claiming that I am jealous of a thick, idiotic piece of sh#t like Mrs X.
2. Referring to “the world I inhabit” is a bit silly, given that you live in a shithole where people like Dale Cregan, the one eyed police killer came from.
3. At no time did I bring up David. You have simply assumed that David told me something, without a shred of evidence.
   Mind you, it doesn’t take much for “accurate information” Mrs X to start on David does it?
4. You say I have no regard for David’s well being yet this is just another silly chimp claim with no accurate information to support it. It is akin to Jason’s claim to be able to get Chrsisy Morris off. For your information, the battles I have with both admin on here in the members forum over David are far greater than anything I have with you and Mrs X regarding the same subject.
5. You are a grubby little tramp from a slum (the chump in the dump). You brag about getting people banned from LB when they are half way through sorting out an issue for a vulnerable debtor. How did that help the debtor? What would have happened if the debtor had not joined this forum?
6. You can’t compete with me in any way, shape or form – All you have in your locker is to take your cowardly cheap shots from behind your keyboard.

Now he’s on to his new target, he can’t stop:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 22:07

Statto wrote: ↑ OMG the games up:

The question that I have is to ask you whether you provided your card details to a friend of yours?

 

Thank you

 

Grrrrrrrrr We would ave got away with it anall if it wasn’t for you pesky degenerates.

Phew!!!

 

We’re off the hook. We live to fight another day, until Mrs X’s next silly, vexatious complaint:

Yes I did.

 

He had the know how, he knew the best options available having done a few bloggs before. Rather than having to to consult on every purchase, I transferred some money into one of my unused debit cards accounts i have a number of accounts, and let him use that. I think I put about fifty or so quid on it. There was no problem, Never thought there would be. I do the same for on line purchases, it prevents the supplier/handler having access to your main accounts.

Of course, the chimp is attempting damage limitation here.

 

What kind of imbecile doesn’t have the “know how” to carry out a simple debit card transaction?

 

As for his silly claims of having several debit cards, this is a tramp who has no money, no savings, lives in a shithole and has two separate charges against the shithole. Furthermore, he relies totally on benefits for income.

 

Oh to live in his world’ I’m intrigued to see what a bullet proof vest looks like

Here he tries to play Mr Nice Guy and goes all religious, while also taking the opportunity to hurl a few insults:

by Statto » 03 Mar 2017 22:46

It is a well-known fact that ###### uses his mental health to manipulate people, he then uses them, betrays them and discards them when he sees fit. The exact same thing will happen to anyone who believes his Tall Tales and trusts him, they can be sure of that

Yet again you misunderstand.

 

He is welcome to do that at any time he feels fit. My attitude is that I will give him as much slack as he wants.

 

The difference is that if he chooses to do so, I will not conduct the despicable hate campaign against him that Mrs X has.

 

Sometimes, you have to be thankful that there but the grace of God go I. I simply want to make a difference to someone’s life, nothing more, nothing less. The man in question is an incredibly funny and incredibly intelligent person – I would trust his judgement ahead of almost everyone on these forums.

 

The problem that scum like Mr B and Mrs X have is that this attitude is alien to them – They cannot comprehend that someone wishes to do something to help a fellow human being and automatically look for a hidden agenda that doesn’t exist.

Let’s not forget that the person he so vehemently defends here was, not long ago, also the target of his wild rants, and evidence of them still exists aplenty and will soon be published.