Mark Bowley a.k.a. JimUK1,Tuco, Statto, Butterfingers, Ted Striker, Indebt, Already Exists, JimUK1, John the Baptist Wrong Again, .
We have seen examples of some of the best rants over the past few days. We had a couple of days of calm, when recent defamatory threads were removed from public view, albeit left open to avid googlers to find for a few hours after the event. For those not familiar with that incident, details are here: The Mysterious Case of the Vanishing Thread. After the calm, Hurricane BHF swept in with deadly fury. A thread that was started to discuss Chrisy Morris’s run in with an enforcement agent quickly descended into a bitchfest of gargantuan proportions, as Firthy so aptly pointed out:
Although the initial bitchfest was aimed at the usual suspect, an unknown quantity made an appearance on this site, someone they couldn’t quite place. They somehow believe only FOUR people have something to say against them, however, there are many more out there apart from the Fab Four. Mark Bowley’s clumsy appearance on Quatloos last year didn’t help matters any. He achieved all the opposite of what he set out to achieve, and attracted the attention of a lot more people who wouldn’t, otherwise, have given them a second look.
When they realised this new poster didn’t fit any of the Fab Four, they had a problem in their hands, and the easiest way to solve it was to assume that this fifth person was, in fact, “Donna”, someone who never had anything to do with the BHF Boys. Her connection was through a certain David Lindley, who posted on the same Facebook group as another lady who also had bailiff issues and had gone to BHF for advice. Somehow they assumed Donna had joined the Fab Four as one of their “lackeys”, their word of choice for anyone who disagrees with them and their relentless abuse.
Back in the days when Mark Bowley joined Quatloos under assorted usernames and received ban after ban under all of them, he came across a prolific poster by the name of “Bones”. Mark somehow assumed that Bones was Donna, and said so time and time again. There was no way on earth to convince him otherwise, not even when Bones himself posted on Quatloos that he was, in fact, Ben. He also changed his signature on the CAG board to reflect this fact and went as far as to post on BHF that he was, in fact, Ben Hall.
Mark has a short fuse and an even shorter memory span, and he came to the conclusion that the person who posted on here was Donna. Bones came clean and started posting as himself but Mark would have none of it, he was adamant that the poster on here was Donna a.k.a. Bones and started hurling the usual insults at “her”. Bones then took matters into his own hands and rang Jason, who refused to talk to him, yet posted the recording on the open forum. What on earth possess him to do that? Leaving aside the legalities of posting up phone conversations without the other party’s consent, all he did was admit that they had been WRONG ALL ALONG in their assumption that Bones = Donna, the voice on the other end of that call didn’t sound like Donna at all!
Not content with the revelation from the man himself, they carried on with the abuse and the rants. Rather than admit he was WRONG ALL ALONG, Mark just started hurling insults at Bones, when he was owed an apology instead.
As if that wasn’t enough, as soon as Mark found out Bones’ real identity, he dug up the dirt on him and posted it up quicker than a nuclear propelled fart. It’s what he does.
Leave a Reply
358 Comments on "Mark Bowley a.k.a. JimUK1,Tuco, Statto, Butterfingers, Ted Striker, Indebt, Already Exists, JimUK1, John the Baptist Wrong Again, ."
Furthermore, my wife and my children have suffered and are all extremely uncomfortable that a 65 year old stranger is constantly monitoring them. I have put up with this activity since the end of 2016. There seems no letting up, no matter what I do to try to stop it. Even when I am not active online, Bardsley continues his harassment and stalking of me.
Why is it necessary to mention my age Mark?
I live in manchester and through disability am largely housebound, so how exactly di I monitor you?
You however regularly boast about what you have read about me on my Facebook, and indeed have a complaint pending against you for actions against my daughter.
The rest and there is much more, is made up nonsense, not worth answering.
Since this Mark has sent another email, where he threatens to “come to Manchester” I find this threat very alarming in the context he made it, and am adding it to my complaint.
The impact of Bardsley’s actions towards me has been very substantial. It has caused me a great deal of anxiety, upset and inconvenience. It has forced me to use aliases whilst at work and has almost certainly hindered my career.
I know nothing of your career Mark, nor do I want to. If it is so precarious then why post insulting diatribes about people on the internet?
Do you expect people just to bow down and take it because your job is at risk, or so you say?
I did hear you were sacked for making insulting remarks about Peter Felton, (solicitor.) The details are on here somewhere, is that what you mean?
If so I should take up with your ex-employer.
“Bardsley operates a website/blog and appears to be the only person who publishes public messages on there. Over a four year period, Bardsley has conducted his campaign on an almost daily basis. On one day alone, he made over fifty (50) defamatory, untrue and offensive posts directed at me.
Sorry but this is untrue. I do not operate any blog, nor have I made “over fifty posts. In fact, it was you and your compatriots who posted over 5000 offensive posts on your cagwrongagain thread over a period of six years, that is one of the reasons this blog was made(and its title), as you well know. We have copies of every post and all the vile personal insults, thousands of em. It had to be stopped.
It may confuse you, although it has been explained many times before. Many of us post under the name Schedule 1, it was originally David’s idea when he constructed the former site. It permits the users to correct their posts and it seems, confuses the hell out of people like you.
As I stated in my previous email, when Bardsley first registered on this website/blog as admin, he did so using a proxy IP address. This suggests that Bardsley knew that what he was doing was wrong and that he was attempting to ensure that his identity could not be traced. How does that work you idiot, I would be anonymous if this were the case).
Bardsley continually makes references to Google searches and it is clear that by constantly posting my name and making false statements about me, he is attempting to enhance Google searches thus causing me distress and inconvenience.
Who owns the current site you post on Mark? You know the one who’s owner is hidden.
If it was a proxy, how the hell would you know it was me Mark?
Anyway, it a lie. No false statements on here Mark. It is odd that you continue to say this, but you do not indicate which these statements are. If they are truly false I am sure they will be removed.
I am unsure what you mean about Google searches.
Mark tries to hide his ignorance by abuse.
Oh no Mark
Mark you should appologise, you said schedule one/dodgeball had never heard of the cases.