Does Bennison known Halloween is finished?That undertaker costume with the ill fitting suit and yellowing teeth really does make him look creepy, you can almost hear him beckoning “Will you walk into my parlour” just like the spider said to the fly”

Mark Bowley in his statement
“I will always support Jason whatever he does:
Yes, brings a tear to the eye.

Jason Bennison in a later statement after being asked about Bowley

“Never heard of him”

Re: Vulnerable – yet car clamped.
Post 20 Nov 2021 07:38

If you are a vulnerable person as defined in the guidelines, then that on its own doesn’t get off the hook for the debt or the enforcement.

However as Newlyn has clamped a car, – which is taking control of goods, that revoked all the enforcement stage fees and charges.

The bailiff clamped your car at 6.02 am, check your home CCTV, if the bailiff clamped it before 6am, that revokes the enforcement and everything that follows.

You need to take a photo of the clamped car showing the wheel clamp and the number plate in the same picture. Make a copy of the Warning of immobilisation attached to the car and collate all other documents given to your Newlyn.

You can apply for a detailed assessment of the fees and charges because the bailiff is in breach of Regulation 12 of the Taking Control of Goods (Fees) Regulations 2014 which states: (highlighted)

Recovery of fees from vulnerable debtors

12. Where the debtor is a vulnerable person, the fee or fees due for the enforcement stage (or, where regulation 6 applies, the first, or first and second, enforcement stages as appropriate) and any disbursements related to that stage (or stages) are not recoverable unless the enforcement agent has, before proceeding to remove goods which have been taken into control, given the debtor an adequate opportunity to get assistance and advice in relation to the exercise of the enforcement power

This post for instance is riddled with errors

Para 1
Vulnerablrity is not defined in the regulations nor in guidlines

Para2
This is another made up case notice lack.of citation or any other details any other forum would not accept this without proof.

Clamping a car is taking control of goods section 13 nothing illegal about it

Certainly no reason to cease enforcement.

Part 3
Why?

Part 4

You.have shown the correct reg
but then interpreted it incorrectly
Part 12 says the bailiff should give
Extra time before removing goods NOT talking them into control. The section is quite clear.

In any case such a minor offence would not necessitate court sction.

Your prospective client is in great danger of losing g a great deal of money.

I think people need to be aware if another fantasy of Bennison
For some reason he keeps mentioning his work for the BBC.

Like his earlier delusions regarding his career as a deep sea diver, aircraft pilot, legal professional and draftsmsmsn. These are delusions.

Even in court under a statement of truth he says he is conducting work in the form of a documentary for the BBC. This turned out to be a naff YouTube video.l

His predelection for setlf engrandisment knows no boundaries

The issue Is,
People give him money based on these claims.
He does not seem to be able to stop.
When the client continues to complain he threatens them with an action for harrassment

Well it’s almost 7.8 k. The Debt Dodger Bennison owes me now.l
still no word. I suppose he could get a job. Now ,what is he good at?

Talking of workshy scroungers . Mark.Bowley is on the scene again, I wish, if he has too copy the output of others he would at least get that right.
He is an obnoxious individual. I will be posting to support benny shortly he is as bad as is boss, the other debtor
.
Really he should stump.up for the crackpot advice he have him.

For instance he provided a witness statement, full of his rants and irrelevant nonesense. Benny chose to withhold this until after the time for filling, presumably so I would not see his bombshell.

No one told him that his opinions0 were nothing to do with the case Benny was attempting to bring.

The judge had the court alter his pleading so it would not appear so absurd. Didn’t stop him , nothing trivial he was using the wrong legislation for both claims, Nothing serious.
This is the legal expert as he describes himself.

Lots to come. incidentally I was just going to let this go (not the costs of course) but people just dont know when to stop it seems.