Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
Zeke, yet another alias for Jason Bennison
Mr benison has just returned from hiding abroad. He had a 50k debt. in regards of unreturned charges to customers and Court costs from failed cases, he was a Bankrupt.
He has no assets and no money and currently living with his mother.
He is desperate for cash.
The reason we mention this, is to give you the choice.
Do You really Want To Give this Man Your Money?
His “advice” is geared solely towards getting you to take court action, and charge you for his services.
Cases he inevitably Loses and gets costs against himself.
Costs which YOU have to pay.
Leave a Reply
136 Comments on "Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt."
Enjoying the bollox he is making up about enforcement ATM.
To think once upon a time, some would have believed it?
He is a none entity. I will get to him in due course.
Well it is now been much over the date by the court for payment of Mr Bardsleys Costs claim of £7.5 k.
He has not a chance of paying.
In fact interest runs at 8%.pa.. I suppose something should be done.
He still makes his claims and advice of course, but, the man is an idiot of the first order,, there is no way of stopping someone who acts without reason. Everyone knows, he is some crackpot clown.
He will not pay out of honour, he has none, he would not know what you where talking about . So to enforcement we go, sadly.
Could admin start an0other heading please.
He should think himself lucky you have waited so long. For me chances are I would have done it straight after receiving the Order. It may be frowned upon not waiting but there is nothing to stop you doing it. Strike while the iron is hot.
40 failed login attempts, today.
Hostname: 119.94.138.128
ASN: 9299
ISP: Philippine Long Distance Telephone
Organization: Philippine Long Distance Telephone
Services: None detected
Type: Broadband
Assignment: Likely Static IP
Continent: Asia
Country: Philippines
State/Region: Province of Bulacan
City:
Wonder who that could be
Perhaps Jason Bennison is desperate to log in and find some good advice for his ‘clients’?
Just to be clear on the farcical claims expressed elwhere About VAT on fees
There has been no cases which effect the status quo,Bennison is off on one of his fantassies again. If he says there has been -case references please, there is no reason not to show details of a decided case.
How many times must the idiots fall for jasons lies, they must be truly thick. High court bailiffs are still charging VAT as of 10am this morning, when I was speaking to them of a related matter.
zeke wrote: ↑13 Jun 2021 20:39
I prepared the argument comparing the VAT arrangement that the bailiff is the “enforcement agent” and they are not VAT registered, and nothing states the bailiff company is a “related party”. The regulations state the “related parties” are the creditor and the bailiff.
monkeynuts asks……. “Do you have a copy of a skeleton argument at all I can look at? I’ve had a couple of cases drop on my work desk on this and normally just direct the advice to what the Governments line is and not Mr Wilson’s
Zeke aka Jason Bennison replies… 24 Jun 2021 17:00
Its not allowed, solicitors dont allow their documents to be shared.
by monkeynuts » 24 Jun 2021 17:38
I thought you prepared the argument. No worries though I will work on one!
Well monkeynuts now you can see how easily the lies roll of Bennison’s tongue. So forget about him preparing a skeleton argument. Having seen the skeleton arguments/witness statement etc ,prepared by him in relation to his own recent court case trust me when I say Jason couldn’t prepare himself for bed.
Jason Bennison (Zeke) Having another pop at other, forums here
Post by zeke » 22 Jun 2021 10:41
You can go online and pay a fixer to do your statutory declarations or witness statements, not something we do here.
“You can find a fixer on various internet forums, usually motoring, legal and consumer forums. No guarantee they wont mess it up for you.”.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Jason may I ask, why you refer the poster to one of your other sites, is it because there is an option to pay on there?
Why do you display a template in the same way you criticise others for doing and a form with all the tick boxes filled in?
Jason, how do you know that the answers you provide on this document refer to the debtors’ problem?
You seem to presume on no evidence that there is an error in the conduct of the authorities.
How do you know this?
Do you think that you could be accused of encouraging the debtor to lie on the document?
Because I certainly do.
Bennison’s Witness statements were rejected twice, his third attempt was saved because a strike out application was approved, Otherwise, it would have been three out of three.
He kept wittering on about some vendetta that was going on in his head.
Mark Bowley was no help to him. He submitted a witness statement, citing some of the crappy things he does, but assigning them to Peter.
He obviously wanted Bennison to file them late so he would not be questioned on them, this was one of the documents withheld from the bundle because Jason wanted the judge to view them without the other side being present, that alone should tell anyone about the depth of Bennison’s knowledge of the law.
Also says a lot about the brave Mr Bowley.
It would also be good to see a link to all the tales of Bailiffs having been found guilty of various offences eg:
” Simon is well known for calling the police when bailiffs come unstuck. But he toned it down after a string of failed prosecutions against debtors and the police force taking a hit for an unlawful imprisonment and false arrest claim.”
OR THIS ONE
” a bailiff took a car and trashed it by breaking open the driver’s door and broke open the glove box and stole an iPhone. The owner has connected th4 iPhone to the car battery to track the vehicle on Google Maps. When the signal stopped transmitting, the owner investigated and found the wrecked vehicle.The owner claimed against the creditor, the council. Not the bailiff, and this revealed there is no company called Jacobs. It was Simon’s own neck on the line for paying the council.”
There are of course many tall tales like the above and never ever a link to follow up with?