PUBLIC INTEREST WARNING: MR JASON BENNISON IS NOW OFFICIALLY BANKRUPT.
Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs Bailiff Help Forum are Wrong Again | Dealing With Bailiffs
Navigation
  • Bennison is bankrupt
  • 2017 – Best Ever Year!
    • Failures
    • Nominet
  • Jason Bennison (Zeke)
    • Business interests
    • Dealing with Bailiffs
    • Failures
    • Pretences and fantasies
    • Money Making Schemes
  • Personal abuse
  • Bad advice
    • Costs orders
    • Misunderstood legislation
    • Magistrate court fines
    • Council Tax enforcement
    • Odd Posts strange ideas
  • David Lindley
  • Mark Bowley
    • Mark’s wild rants
  • Pote Snitkin
  • Other subjects

Bailiff Help Forum – lacking in qualified advisors

So, who is qualified to give advice on that forum? It looks like nobody these days!

Whatever happened to the Likely Lads?

Once upon a time, there used to be a number of moderators/regular posters such as Hithard, Andy, Monkeynuts, etc. Remember them? Back in the day, they were prolific posters, even if not the best and most knowledgeable advisors. They all seem to have decamped and left the forum to its founders. It’s all well and good to have “admins” and “moderators”, but what good is it, when they’re not around to give any advice? All the two ladies ever do is move a thread to another part of the forum and, occasionally, merge two threads. Amy can be spotted on the odd parking thread and Michelle is often seen on threads regarding set aside applications for CCJs, but what about the main subject of the forum, which is enforcement?

Who is there today?

The only advisors BHF has these days are:

  • The Master or “Guru”, BHF’s founder, who also owns and runs DWB and Beat the Bailiff, whatever name he chooses to go under, he’s kept his vital links in his signature, to ensure he doesn’t lose any business.
  • JimUK1, who’s changed his name more times thank his socks, but we all know who he is, regardless of whatever name he chooses to post as. At some point, he was also a prolific poster, although, of his own admission, his main area of expertise was council tax, due to his previous experiences dealing with it. He was never big on court fines, which are the most troublesome in view of the risk of forced entry, nor traffic and parking issues, which are the most frequent. These days, he seems to concentrate mostly on slagging off people rather than giving advice. OK, he’s always done that. but at least at some point, he also corrected The Master’s advice.
  • Mushroom Pote, always loyal to his Master. After all these years, he has learned a thing or two, but, like the loyal pet he is, he’s never learned to contradict his Master. That leaves him in a corner and not really in a position to provide any sensible advice.

A much needed alternative

In view of the gap left by the departure of previous posters, and the lack of assertiveness of current ones, the place is in desperate need of someone who knows what they’re talking about, to correct the often disastrous advice. That’s just where this site comes in, to provide an alternative and respond to, all the bad advice posted on the Bailiff Help Forum. That should be obvious from the name anyway.

 

 

 

20th August 2017 / Bad advice, Council Tax enforcement, Featured, Legalities, Magistrate court fines, Misunderstood legislation, Odd Posts strange ideas, Opinion and Comments / Tags: bad advice

Share the Post

Leave a Reply

78 Comments on "Bailiff Help Forum – lacking in qualified advisors"

Manage Subscriptions ∨





Admin
Schedule One
4 years 8 months ago

Cheers chimp – I’ve enjoyed my blast. I’m off to sunnier climes for a week in the morning. I do hope you’ll still be here when I return.

coco

I hope Jason isn’t driving.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Speak Out
4 years 8 months ago

Mark Bowley is right, it is good to SPEAK OUT when wrong advise is given.

He can write a 2,000 word post to humiliate individuals, but ignores debtors seeking help. This is an excellent example where the misinformation from Jason Bennison is alarming.
And where was Mark Bowley? As the query wasn’t a council taxdebt, he was out of his comfort zone.

http://www.bailiffhelpforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=5070

Debtor:

Turns out was for London congestion charge

Jason Bennison (Schedule 12)

Phone Transport for London (or Highways England if TFL doesn’t recognise it) giving the registration number of the car. The should give the PCN number., It starts with two alpha characters followed by 8 or 9 numbers.

On completing a TE7, Bennison suggests this:

On the TE7 late appeal. Same again but under Reason:
• The Notice to Owner was sent to my previous address and the council did not apply for a new warrant pursuant to CPR75.7 before starting enforcement at my current address.

Sign and Date. These do not need to be notorised by a solicitor.

Gather evidence of your living at your Current address and attach to the TE9

And to continue misleading the public, Jason Bennison finishes with this nonsense:

Email them to tec@hmcts.gsi.go.uk with the PCN number in the subject line and enforcement is stopped in real time.

The PCN will be rewound back to the original contravention.

As an expert with these applications (71 acceptances last week, 66 acceptances the week before and 58 the week before that), it is left to me to correct the above:

1): This is a TfL congestion charge. Why in heavens name would the debtor call Highways England !! They only deal with Dart Charges…and NOT a TfL congestion charge.

2): No PCN consists of 9 numbers. There can only ever be 8 numbers.

3): Using the suggested wording is doomed to lead to the application being rejected. Far more information is required. Simply pathetic.

4): Submitting the forms to the Traffic Enforcement Centre does NOT mean that ‘enforcement is stopped in real time’. The forms are PROCESSED by 4pm. Enforcement is placed on hold once the enforcement company receive instructions…and not before.

5): The PCN will NOT be ‘rewound back to the original contravention’. That will only happen if the application is accepted…and using his draft…..that won’t happen.

PS: I did receive news two weeks ago that one OOT that I had assisted with had been refused. Dreadfully upsetting but thankfully, a rarity. Also, for the sake of accuracy, the vast majority of the applications that I draft are free of charge.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Speak Out
4 years 8 months ago

Taking Mark Bowley’s suggestion that if anyone should see something that is wrong they should SPEAK OUT, then he may want to answer why in 6 months he didn’t bother to respond on this thread.

http://www.bailiffhelpforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=4815

Jason Bennison provided the debtor with the most appalling advice going. It was shameful. And what is worse, is that he alone was responsible for this debtor paying a 2nd Stage and Sale stage fee to the HCEO.

What he needs to remember is this. Way after a thread has finished being posted on, it will be on view to naive debtors. If he had any thought at all for the public he would correct the advice.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Speak Out
4 years 8 months ago

More evidence of bizarre posting from Mark Bowley. This time aimed at Peter B on a subject of such little importance in the overall scheme of things….in house enforcement. Which by the way, is a subject that I know a great deal about and he doesn’t !!

“i would love to point out exactly where you are wrong on this particular matter. Why should I waste my time?

And then this comment:

“Don’t expect any further responses”

So was there a response? Of course there was and straight away as well. His reply like most on there almost bore you to death by not only the length of the post but the repetitive content. His replies are nothing short of anger filled rants.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             Hide Replies ∧
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Admin
Schedule One
4 years 8 months ago

In house enforcement under TCE is a very interesting subject, it is a shame it cannot be discussed and debated on here or CAG for instance, some of us enjoy the debate, but without the abuse.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Speak Out
4 years 8 months ago

I absolutely love debating…always have done…always will but there is a skill to good debating and unlike Mark Bowley, I posses such a skill. He doesn’t.

You have to stay objective when debating a subject and put aside your personal feelings. Mark Bowley’s position is that unless somebody agrees with his viewpoint, he turns to aggression.

Also, how could you possibly debate a subject when one party to the debate is on this blog and the other party is on another blog. It’s too stupid to even give a second thought to.

Also, ‘in house’ enforcement is actually not that important a subject. Of far greater importance are the proposals made for fees to be charged to AOE and the registering of LO’s with credit reference agencies. I have spent a considerable amount of time debating both subjects (and not on forums either).

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Admin
Schedule One
4 years 8 months ago

Absolutely, as do I.
CAG used to be very good at it.
There is an enormous thread on there , on which we deciphered and debated consumer credit for instance, which was wonderfully engaging and spread a lot if knowledge, unfortunately due to ego and self interest we are not to be permitted a similar facility.

Mark :
There has been no secret whispers passed regarding legislation, that is just your paranoia and self doubt, plus the fact that no one wishes to :engage with you.

The matters you constantly referring to were settled years ago, just because you only now are seeing the light does not effect us.

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



Guest
Speak Out
4 years 8 months ago

If there was a more stupid comments than this one from Mark Bowley can anybody tell me what it is.

“To the pathetic xxxxx the answer to your question is that we are on the side of the debtor. It doesn’t matter if it is Jason or your mistress who is wrong – We will always speak out. You should try it some time”

His posts on that forum over the past few months are just bizarre but this one takes some beating and will be a post that I will make sure to save….and make sure to keep reminding him of.

With such a passion for assisting debtors and ensuring that accurate information is given to the public, I would do EXACTLY what Mark Bowley is now advising………when I identified wrong advice, I would SPEAK OUT. But instead of being congratulated, Mr Bowley would be the first one to reply on that forum with the most hate filled and abusive reply.

PS: At least he has given me the opportunity to think of a new username on here (aside from (Shirl, BA and TT).

0
 |     Reply   -   Share             
Manage Subscriptions ∨



 
  • Next Post
  • Previous Post

PUBLIC INTEREST WARNING

Mr Bennison was made bankrupt as a result of the £26,000 costs order that Nominet obtained against him in September 2017. His bankruptcy hearing took place on October 2nd 2018 at Kingston County Court and Jason Bennison has lost yet another case, where costs will be awarded to the Defendant. This may result in Bennison's second bankruptcy is he is unable to pay.

If you have any comments or issues regarding this site, please Contact us

Recent Comments

  • Schedule One on Nominet and Bennison’s Bankruptcy: it was all for nothing!
  • wwe on Nominet and Bennison’s Bankruptcy: it was all for nothing!
  • Schedule One on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Pb on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Schedule One on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Peter.Bardsley (Ba 78 lanks) on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Beagle on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Quatlose on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • I Dunno on Bennison v Bardsley
  • peter Frank Bardsley on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Peter on Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • Santa on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Sigmond on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Walt on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Walt on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Halloween on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Mity on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Bennison the debtor on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Dick on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • PB on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • striker on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Bennison serial Debtor on Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Nonono on Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Friend on Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Schedule One on CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Schedule One on Bennison v Bardsley

Recent Posts

  • Council Tax Bailiffs, Fines from Magistrate Court Bailiffs, High Court Bailiffs.
  • Odd and Interesting Stories That Caught my Eye
  • Bennison’s Bailiff Help Forum Archives
  • Bennison’s Blog – the Fishy Site
  • Bennison v Bardsley
  • Jason Bennison.com : Mr Bennisons new assault on the legal services market.
  • Mark Bowley Rants. Random insults and assorted verbage of an internet troll.
  • CHARGING V.A.T on HCEO Enforcement Fees is Completely Legal
  • Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
  • Jason Bennison picks on small cake shop, Why?

The Best of 2017

  • Jason Bennison Liar, Con Man, Cheat and registered Bankrupt
  • The Best of 2017
  • Bennison’s Nemesis: Nominet
  • 2017 – Best Ever Year for Bennison & BHF!
  • Rantaholic Bowley ends the year in a high note
  • New Year, new abode for Bennison

Categories

Sign Up Newsletter

Make sure you don’t miss interesting happenings
by joining our newsletter program.