Mark Bowley, (Tuco, Statto, Gary Brown, Mark1960, Starving Taxpayer, JimUK1, John the Baptist and Butterfingers) – unqualified Paralegal
Mark Bowley is a 58 in year old granddad from Lichfield. He is Jason Bennison’s right hand man (or nodding dog) on the Bailiff Help Forum and posts with the usernames of Tuco, Statto, and previously; as Mark1960.
He also has a hatred for bailiffs posting publicly that he would ‘pay big money to have some wicked and evil things done to them’.
A Quatloos poster summed up Mark Bowley very well. He referred to him as being clinically paranoid and dangerously obsessed with certain people, whilst being completely blind to his own crazy childish conduct. It’s probably a fair comment.
He claims on here to thrive on forums ganging up against him, and loves people insulting him. A very strange man indeed.
Leave a Reply
388 Comments on "Mark Bowley, (Tuco, Statto, Gary Brown, Mark1960, Starving Taxpayer, JimUK1, John the Baptist and Butterfingers) – unqualified Paralegal"
Didn’t Mark swear he had never had any defaults or money problems?
“feel too sorry for me sonny. I had a total of around £30k credit, paid back around £5k, the rest was written off.”
Incidentally. no one wrote off anything, he is still being perused.
No One need to say anything about Mark and Jasons lack of knowledge(or even basic intelligence) Just read what other people say. Fist an example of Marks real life and character, the thread address is underneath.
Post by Tuco » Wed Dec 14, 2016 4:31 pm
rumpelstilzchen wrote:
Sadly for Tuco ten-year-olds don’t decide court cases.
:haha:
Don’t feel too sorry for me sonny. I had a total of around £30k credit, paid back around £5k, the rest was written off.
Pity they didn’t have you acting for them eh? You know best. :haha:
http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10297&hilit=henti&sid=bd3041dfbdd6c613e7cd0c7ee3f2e3e2&start=160
I followed the link and I was shocked by Marks aggressive attitude throughout the thread.. I see elsewhere on this blog Mark commented in a letter to Peter his new in-laws were troubled by what they have resd about him (Mark) Well I must say if I had witnessed the
some of the abusive,aggressive posts made by Mark along with the extent of his lies, I would also be very worried that my daughter was married to him.
Yes my thoughts too, If he doesn’t want to be known as a yob, he should not talk the way he does. Frankly begging Peter not to show some of his work is a bit rich.
Ghost Town
Pote and co, Now, are you sure you want to start this again?
Pills Jason? Care to elaborate.
Anyone any idea hat Ian is on about here?
I have posted statutes and case law to support my argument – The other bloke has googled an internet forum to glean his information, has side stepped from one stance to a completely different stance, ignored your request to him to name the case (because he didn’t know what it was) and failed to realise that there were actually 3 cases being quoted, not one
Mark says he has made a “complaint”.
This is the person who delights in targetting people’s families on the net. Doesn’t like it when he is being pulled up for his errors, does he? It is fine when he is abusing others though. Anyone interested in Marks’ abuse should read this thread and the others on here.