Mark Bowley, (Tuco, Statto, Gary Brown, Mark1960, Starving Taxpayer, JimUK1, John the Baptist and Butterfingers) – unqualified Paralegal
Mark Bowley is a 58 in year old granddad from Lichfield. He is Jason Bennison’s right hand man (or nodding dog) on the Bailiff Help Forum and posts with the usernames of Tuco, Statto, and previously; as Mark1960.
He also has a hatred for bailiffs posting publicly that he would ‘pay big money to have some wicked and evil things done to them’.
A Quatloos poster summed up Mark Bowley very well. He referred to him as being clinically paranoid and dangerously obsessed with certain people, whilst being completely blind to his own crazy childish conduct. It’s probably a fair comment.
He claims on here to thrive on forums ganging up against him, and loves people insulting him. A very strange man indeed.
Leave a Reply
397 Comments on "Mark Bowley, (Tuco, Statto, Gary Brown, Mark1960, Starving Taxpayer, JimUK1, John the Baptist and Butterfingers) – unqualified Paralegal"
It seems mr Bowley has adopted the above gif as his Avatar and uses it on his Blog.
Its OK Mark. People already associate it with you. You can have it.
Mark Richard Bowley forgets what he does the instant he does it, it seems.
He accuses Peter of being a coward attacking from behind his keyboard, but he posts pictures of his 2-year-old on his blog, calling the beautiful girl and her big sister “ugly”. Now, what if she saw that.
Words fail me, I don’t believe in evil, but since I encountered the people from that forum, I am, I admit struggling.
Yes, indeed.
Just for the record. I have never had a “charging order on my houses, 43 years, not once missed a payment on my home.
I can ring my bank and get 85k, in.half an hour, No defaults either, I have been very lucky indeed.
How does that make you feel, you jealous little Nesbit?
,
I am sure you won’t mind me mentioning your name, as you make so free with mine and all my families.
Mark, I am not selling any of my properties, what would I do that? and what business of anyone else’s would it be anyway.
As I told Jason to his face recently, I do not have a vendetta against him or anyone else/
It is absurd, does everyone who criticises his “work” has a vendetta against him? There are whole forums of people who think he is barmy. including his enforcer Mark Richard Bowley of Dependable Builders.
I am sure he won’t mind me mentioning his name, as he makes so free with mine, and the rest of my families.
Mind, he is a few sandwiches away from the top floor himself.
Having a good laugh at his accountancy ideas yesterday.
First Mark. You get rebaits for lots of things, really too many to mention, most people would know this,
I suppose you would have to pay some first though,
Looking at the figures from Company House website, his last three business have never made one penny. I blame his, somewhat less than magnetic personality.
I have never”boasted” about anything, let alone “getting someone a refund”, silly man. He goes on to say, you can only get a refund if you have paid too much, and that would somehow be my fault. Mark, you’re an idiot.
Now Mark, seriously,
The PF blog needs to be moderated. You have malicious posts may about my family even my two-year-old grandson, compete with an uploaded picture. who has nothing to do with this?
They need to be removed.
Please don’t give me that, not me m’lud(is that what you say?).
I have all the proof I need. please don’t bother with the rest about me, people who know me, know me, and those who don’t, if they can’t see through your rhetoric, then I do not want to know them.,
Although also, the stuff about S is cause for a hundred complaints, and I should be very wary. You can only push people so far or have you yet to learn this.
Despite all the childish nonsense that this post will bring, There must be one iota of sense that tells you, whatever inference Benny has taken about the mention of his family, is nothing compared to his actions, Putting pictures on the net and disparaging them for no good reason is wrong. They have done nothing.
He will be brought to book for this, have no fear. Besides we both know hat his family did not suffer at all, at least they say they didn’t. If anything they suffered by his presence.
I have just come across this tread. Just how long has Mr Bowley been behaving in this way?
Oh, Mark has been spreading his vitriolic posts for many years and against many targets.
I believe he started on the Freedom of the land forum as Butterfingers in 2009. His favourite insults are, cretin, imbecile, idiot, cesspit, speck head? many more.
The insults he thrives on most, are misinterpretations of his reading whilst trolling other people’s Facebook accounts.
He has his own thread, created on the forum “Consumer Action Group,” simply entitled Troll.
They tried banning him, but he just kept coming back under different user names. Unfortunately, Mr Bowley seems unable to switch off his vile demean and is instantly recognisable.
The cause of his hatred And frustration, IMO is that one morning in 2009 he decided he was going to be a legal expert, and to date, no one with any legal knowledge will agree with him.
His lies and distorted reports are made to deflect criticism. He now can only post on the BHF forum, because no other more reputable forums will entertain his personal rants and dubious advice
See here,http://www.quatloos.com/Q-Forum/viewtopic.php?f=52&t=10297&sid=0eced1732197c09e93076f613b733da0&start=200
Post by Tuco » Wed Dec 14, 2016 6:13 pm
No Dave. It is not my argument. For the final time, forget about assigning the debt and forget about DCAs.
Watch Simon Goldberg’s video. He explains it clearly. When you sign your loan agreement, it becomes a commercial instrument. It has value and it is your signature that guarantees it. The bank who loaned you the money then take a photocopy of the agreement, file the photocopy and then SELL the original. It is not “accidently” lost or put in a box in someones loft as Bones stupidly thinks, it is SOLD.
This is my problem and this is what idiots are asking me to prove.
Why do you think that there is NEVER an original and ALWAYS a photocopy? Why are the photocopies guarded so heavily?
It is your signature that guarantees the instrument yet you are never told this at disclosure stage. Nor are you told that the instrument may be traded many times throughout the industry. Nor are you told that your data could be exposed to God knows who.
No sane person would suggest that this course of action is ethical, moral or indeed lawful. Certainly, any contract entered into would not be able to be lawfully sold on. If a DCA get hold of the debt (and usually they do), you simply need to advise that the contract was breached by the original lender. I used to ask for sight of the original agreement, unstamped and unendorsed (to show that it hadn’t been traded) and if they could not do this (which obviously they couldn’t) then they would have to let a court decide if any money was outstanding.
I’m no expert on the trading side of things but I suspect this false creation of funds by adding digits to accounts (by trading these agreements) contributed heavily to the crisis the banking sector found itself in a few years back and the taxpayer had to bail them out because of it.
The long thread on Quatloose ended in these sage words, addressed to Mr Bowley, and not from anyone associated with this blog.
He has repeatedly demonstrated that he doesn’t understand the topic in which he is posting about. He is unwilling to listen to reason and is unable to provide any evidence to support any of his claims, even though he said he could and would.
Given the circumstances that no one agrees with his view of the world, providing his disruption is confined only to this thread, I don’t see the harm in, letting him freely continue.
At the end of the day, I feel that Tuco and the claims he is unable to prove are pretty much harmless. He just craves attention and I am guilty of giving some to him. However, for me, he is nothing but a source of amusement.
I have even thanked him for his entertainment value.
And
I hope that Tuco accepts the information provided in the way I have intended – being to help him understand and not to make him look like a complete idiot
Mark has been chased by bailiffs many times. They even took his car. according to what he has said.
That’s really the route cause of all the hate. As he also said,he doesn’t give a monkeys about peoples debt problems.He just wants somewhere to rant see pic at top of thread.
Seems that you are correct Yob.
This is what he included in his personal threat made to Peter.
“Not interested in bailiff law now and little sympathy for debtors. My experience is that the vast majority are scum who know exactly what they are doing. I’d love to tell you some of the stories. All this point scoring and mithering about “poor vulnerable debtors” is a joke”.