Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt.
Zeke, yet another alias for Jason Bennison
Mr benison has just returned from hiding abroad. He had a 50k debt. in regards of unreturned charges to customers and Court costs from failed cases, he was a Bankrupt.
He has no assets and no money and currently living with his mother.
He is desperate for cash.
The reason we mention this, is to give you the choice.
Do You really Want To Give this Man Your Money?
His “advice” is geared solely towards getting you to take court action, and charge you for his services.
Cases he inevitably Loses and gets costs against himself.
Costs which YOU have to pay.
Leave a Reply
122 Comments on "Jason Bennison(Zeke)Liar Slanderer, Cheat, Fantasist, Unqualified,Uninsured, Chancer, Discharged Bancrupt."
Oh look an invitation for Jason Bennison to bring his pet solicitor on board.
Bailiff Talk:
Post by Paulnmusic » 04 Nov 2020 13:14
Quick update, had hearing today, it has been adjourned and DCBL istructed to supply the full unedited footage so i can appoint times (points) when the damage occurred. I was informed that further claims are not important, so attempting to state the agent was not allowed in the property in the first place did not get heard, nevermind taking control whilst alone with a vulnerable adult and so on.
I intend to find a suitable barrister via public access, share all of my information, upon conclusion of the claim, possible entering others for the breaches, cost andf distress caused as well as making it public, in order to achieve a solution to this rogue com
So, it seems that all Mr Bennison’s advice re, Schedule Twelve breaches have been thrown out.
The claimant is left with a common law breach for damages of the furniture or floor.
I hope the claimant has made a complaint about this to the bailiff and given them a chance to remedy, without yet more fee help from the gov, and unnecessary wasted court time.
I also hope he does not waste his money on over the top legal help. I doubt very much a Barrister would take this case.
The poster is doomed, dooommed if Bennison is involved.
Here is another money spinning idea from the con man Jason Bennison aka ‘zeke’ from Bailiff Talk, Stop the Bailiff etc etc.
From Stop Stop the baililifs by the self proclaimed ‘EXPERT’
“All Template Letters, emails and Statements – £19!
For a one-off donation of just £19 to support continuation of our free advice, you can access our unrivalled resources, Britains’ top repository of knowledge for stopping and redressing non-compliant enforcement action”.
A serial guzzler of Jasons garbage asks.:
Post by westcunttree » 11 Jul 2020 09:31
Morning all
If my vehicle is registered in Scotland and someone Ient my vehicle gets a speeding ticket in England would they enforce as I know they cant with pcns due to The jurisdiction of Civil Procedure Rule 75 and the Traffic Enforcement Centre is
limited to England and Wales.
Thanks in advances
Pote replies
Post by Syd Snitkin » 11 Jul 2020 12:08
They couldn’t enforce at the Scottish address but there is a risk of ANPR detection if driven in England
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hmm. Speeding Pote? Please dont ask me to explain further.
#3 Re: 6 Year Rule
Post by BODY-CAM » 26 Jun 2020 17:51
So would it be LAW??? If it had been obtained out of time after the six years. Limitation act!
Top
zeke
Posts: 2353
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 21:23
#4 Re: 6 Year Rule
Post by zeke » 26 Jun 2020 18:25
If the judgment was more than six years on the date the transfer to the High Court was made. The writ is “defective” and a party may recover damages.
For debtors, its paragraph 66 of Schedule 12 of the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
Non debtors, its section 3 of the Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977. If an urgent application is needed then section 4 of the Act.
Top
BODY-CAM
Posts: 13
Joined: 30 Jun 2016 16:02
#5 Re: 6 Year Rule
Post by BODY-CAM » 27 Jun 2020 06:06
So if the writ is defective would a bailiff have the right to enforce it knowing it was defective.
Would they have the right to enter a private dwelling? To enforce it!
Top
zeke
Posts: 2353
Joined: 30 Jul 2012 21:23
#6 Re: 6 Year Rule
Post by zeke » 27 Jun 2020 06:40
The officer would have to have permissionbut
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Actually yes and no. If six years had passed between the order and request for a warrant, but this has nothing to do with the SOL (does it mark?).
He has gone from a door to door toilette goods salesman to a super qualified lawyer in one leap. I dont know anyone, even trained solicitors who claim expertise in all those areas of law.
Hi Nick.