Just to avoid confusion Jason calls himself J Carpenter on there, one of many aliases.

if anyone is interested here it is.

https://www.dealingwithbailiffs.co.uk/forms/view.php?id=16812

Has anyone noticed he has removed the link to his £35 chargeable adviceline, from the bottom of the pages over there?.

“Author, Dealing with Bailiffs. Beat the Bailiffs  Instant phone consultation with me: Click here”

Then there is this#

jasonDWB
#167 Re: Peter Bardsley (Stalybridge) Screwball Internet Troll   27 Feb 2017 13:27
 
3/16/2017 (1) Peter Bardsley (Stalybridge) Screwball Internet Troll ­ Page 5 ­ Bailiff Help Forum
http://bailiffhelpforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=39&start=140&t=4240&sid=d4115e1a9ced45e4892a787f9207b93e 10/12

I had to. I have instructed Nominet to start work. When Peter is named by 123‐reg Limited as having control of the domain name, I’ll empty his pockets.
He thinks I’ll do him for defamation, so he and the xxxx will ready himself for that, but I’ll make a small claim track claim for my ICANN disbursements. I’ll then doorstep visit him into court and make him face me into a toxic proceeding for damages for contradicting ICANN terms of abusive registration terms of his two domain names.
I know Sheila will wail on about my personal circumstances, but that is not the cause of action I am applying for.
You have a blog, is there any chance we can revive this.

Hundreds like this. Would you call this harassment?
There are quite literally hundreds like this, and far worse.
notice always with Peters full name and address.

Just walking down memory lane. There to be some terribly ill judged post regarding Peter in the past. All hiden now of course. They do seem to think disability is finny dont they

16/2017 (1) Peter Bardsley (Stalybridge) Screwball Internet Troll ­ Page 5 ­ Bailiff Help Forum
http://bailiffhelpforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=39&start=140&t=4240&sid=d4115e1a9ced45e4892a787f9207b93e 6/12

shortcomings in real life.
Bardsley picks the side who has the biggest numbers and he sides with them. Look back and try to see one time when he agrees with the underdog. He backed Harding because 3 years ago, she had following and respect. These days most regulars see her for what she is but Bardsley is stuck supporting her now. Look at his posts as “Henti” and “Andy 58” to see how he tries to bring others onside, in order to play the numbers game with the person he is arguing with. Look also at the amount of times he tries to bring Quatloosers into his argument. Finally, if you look back on LB, you will see Bardsleys stupid attempts to try to lock horns with a solicitor. He ended up showing himself up to be as bigger idiot then, as he did when he attempted to take on BHF.
Your problem is that you think that everyone has a “money” angle. Bardsley seeks no financial gain for his posts, merely acceptance, to compensate a lifetime of failure and ridicule.
As for him being “retired”, by his own admission, he is registered disabled and cannot work. He relies on benefits to survive and has little life away from the internet. He has no income and no property empire, despite his claims. The sum total of his lifetimes work is a shithole of a house worth around £100K. Even then, he still has 2 outstanding charges on it, despite living there for 40 years.
The internet is a great leveller. It allows idiotic tramps like Bardsley to talk to people who are way, way out of his league, as if they are his equals.

And Jasons own thoughts

#161 Re: Peter Bardsley (Stalybridge) Screwball Internet Troll   26 Feb 2017 22:36
Statto wrote: ↑ He has no income and no property empire, despite his claims. The sum total of his lifetimes work is a shithole of a house worth around £100K. Even then, he still has 2 outstanding charges on it, despite living there for 40 years.
I just checked. You have your facts right. He is no stranger to debt and charging orders.
We know Peter has control of the domain name and uses the services of Identity Protect Ltd. We know the wordpress admin name is Sheila. Peter has posted defamatory information about me on there which he knows is not true.
He has no defense. I can now bring an action against him and it won’t cost me a bean.
If the blog is still there in the morning, I will start the show. He has no choice but to face me at court